74/100
HighHow much of this occupation’s work can be materially affected by current AI systems.
62/100
HighHow likely exposure is to translate into reduced human demand.
Includes provisional estimates for AI adoption pressure and labour-market resilience. How this is measured
Confidence reflects task coverage, mapping and capability-evidence quality, and how much of the score rests on provisional inputs.
Task-level evidence
What is driving the score?
Occupation scores are built from the task mix—not a single prediction about a job title.
TaskImportanceAI impactExposure
Research laws, court decisions, documents, opinions, briefs, or other information related to cases before the court.High75
Prepare briefs, legal memoranda, or statements of issues involved in cases, including appropriate suggestions or recommendations.High75
Draft or proofread judicial opinions, decisions, or citations.High75
Review complaints, petitions, motions, or pleadings that have been filed to determine issues involved or basis for relief.High74
Confer with judges concerning legal questions, construction of documents, or granting of orders.High77
Enter information into computerized court calendar, filing, or case management systems.Medium73
Attend court sessions to hear oral arguments or record necessary case information.Medium77
Review dockets of pending litigation to ensure adequate progress.Medium75
Verify that all files, complaints, or other papers are available and in the proper order.Medium74
Keep abreast of changes in the law and inform judges when cases are affected by such changes.High74
Communicate with counsel regarding case management or procedural requirements.Medium69
Respond to questions from judicial officers or court staff on general legal issues.Medium62
Where AI can do more
Routine, digitized, and highly repeatable tasks face the greatest pressure.
- Confer with judges concerning legal questions, construction of documents, or granting of orders.77
- Attend court sessions to hear oral arguments or record necessary case information.77
- Research laws, court decisions, documents, opinions, briefs, or other information related to cases before the court.75
- Prepare briefs, legal memoranda, or statements of issues involved in cases, including appropriate suggestions or recommendations.75
Where people still matter
These tasks score lowest on automation feasibility—physical presence, judgement, accountability and real-world variability all resist end-to-end automation.
- Draft or proofread judicial opinions, decisions, or citations.01
- Review complaints, petitions, motions, or pleadings that have been filed to determine issues involved or basis for relief.02
- Review dockets of pending litigation to ensure adequate progress.03
- Verify that all files, complaints, or other papers are available and in the proper order.04
- Keep abreast of changes in the law and inform judges when cases are affected by such changes.05
Where else this work leads
Related occupations
Occupations O*NET links to this one. Relatedness reflects shared work, not a claim that these roles are safer.
Paralegals and Legal Assistants
Closely related work
Compare these careers →Equal Opportunity Representatives and Officers
Related work
Compare these careers →Court, Municipal, and License Clerks
Shares some work
Compare these careers →Title Examiners, Abstractors, and Searchers
Shares some work
Compare these careers →Bailiffs
Shares some work
Compare these careers →Detectives and Criminal Investigators
Shares some work
Compare these careers →Beyond AI capability
Adoption and labour-market outlook
Structural factors are kept separate from raw capability so you can see what actually resists automation. Adoption pressure and labour-market resilience are still provisional models—25% of this occupation’s replacement-risk weight rests on them.
Methodology & sources
O*NET 30.3 occupational data interpreted through the JobsVsAI capability, automation and structural-constraint models.
Confidence84/100
CalculatedAug 21, 2026
Read methodology →